Evolution of Pay Equity in Canada

Published

September 20, 2023

Category

Tags

Table of Contents

Despite several government pay equity initiatives, there is still a gap between men’s and women’s pay… but why?

Whether employed or looking for work, it is useful for clients to be aware of the issues surrounding pay equity and the legal recourse available to obtain fair working conditions. CDPs can assist clients by helping them negotiate equitable compensation and guide employers to implement nondiscriminatory working conditions.

Pay equity has been guaranteed by Canadian laws for over 40 years yet a gap persists between men’s and women’s incomes. Moreover, a 2001 study showed that the wage gap between men and women could not be explained by gender – nor by education, age, or sector of employment. So how can we explain this gap? That’s the question Girard, Laflamme, and Tremblay wanted to answer, using data from the 2016 Canadian census. 

The researchers first compiled the annual income of 498,044 people (242,523 women and 255,521 men). They found that women earned 67.6% of men’s salaries. Although men’s and women’s wages increase with age and level of education, women’s wages are always lower for the same category. There is only one exception: Part-time working men earn slightly less than women in the same employment situation, but the difference is less than $2,000 a year.  

The researchers also analyzed wage differences by income bracket. According to the data, a higher proportion of women earn less than $50,000 a year, and women’s top salary ($414,316) is one third of men’s top salary ($1,236,606). These figures highlight that pay equity is not being achieved despite the measures put in place by the government since the 1960s.

The authors then analyzed the income averages for 2016 to determine which factor (gender, age, level of education, sector of employment, or type of job) had the greatest influence on income variation. The result is the same as in 2001: Gender is the factor that least explains the difference in income between the sexes. According to the article, this is due to the fact that being a man or a woman is less and less reducible to the category itself. Indeed, each gender is nowadays expressed in a multitude of modalities of being, diversity, similarities and differences, making the groups “women” and “men” less homogeneous than they once were. Today, women have greater access to education, can work in a variety of fields, and have relative autonomy when it comes to family planning, but they still suffer from pay inequity. Why?  The study concludes that the system itself does not achieve pay equity because of the continuing institutional sexism. Indeed, the measures put in place to achieve pay equity are not effective, as they are based on the idea that women in situations of pay inequity must themselves file complaints, requiring them to be aware of the situation and to be willing and able to denounce it. In this context, it is important that our sector continues to support equal pay by sharing knowledge, supporting workers, and educating employers.

Research / Original Citation

Girard, M., Laflamme, S. & Tremblay, É. (2023). Équité salariale entre les sexes au Canada de 1971 à 2016: note empirique. Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 18(2), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.7202/1101836ar

There are other, more subtle factors linked to social gender roles, expectations and prejudices towards women, motherhood and wage negotiation that may explain the differences in income between men and women. The study does not focus on this sociological dimension of the phenomenon, which could also be a valid analytical framework.

Fun Facts

International Equal Pay Day has been celebrated on September 18 since 2020. Yet in Canada, Equal Pay Day is also celebrated on April 4. This date was chosen because it corresponds approximately to the date when women’s median pay reaches that of men’s annual salary the previous year. Indeed, it takes 16 months for women’s median pay to catch up with what men earn in 12 months.

Community Submission

Your Thoughts

In your practice, have you ever faced a situation of pay inequity when working with a client? How did you support your client through it?

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from the Library

Career Development Professional Centre

Code of Conduct

Help us cultivate a Centre we all enjoy by reviewing and following the Code of Conduct.

Our Purpose

Thank you for being a part of the Career Development Professional Centre. To ensure that all members have the best possible experience, we have a few ground rules that we ask everyone to adhere to. This code of conduct applies equally to every person in the community and is intended to foster an online space that is inclusive, safe, and welcoming to all.

Centre Rules

Be welcoming

We strive to be a place that welcomes and supports people of all backgrounds and identities. We aim to be a place that promotes excellence and innovation in career and workforce development. Please extend respect to all members; we all come from different backgrounds and levels of knowledge and there is no such thing as a stupid question.

Be respectful

We won’t all agree all the time, but when we disagree don’t let those disagreements turn into personal attacks. A place where people feel uncomfortable or threatened will not be a productive one. When having discussions in the online community, commenting on a library article, or participating in other Centre activities, strive for productive conversations around the content being presented, not the person behind the content. Any comments determined to be “hate speech” towards any individual or group will be deleted, and the user account may be locked until an investigation regarding the comment has been concluded. The user may be given a written warning or removed from the CPDC platform depending on the findings of the investigation.

Hate Speech could include and is not limited to:

  • Violent threats or language directed against another person
  • Discriminatory jokes, language, or materials
  • Defamatory or abusive language or materials
  • Profane or illegal materials
  • Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior

A good rule of thumb is to never say anything that you wouldn’t be comfortable with the world seeing or that you wouldn’t want anyone knowing came from you. We ask that you keep in mind the focus of this place, which is building excellence and innovation in career and workforce development for all individuals.

Be considerate of the purpose of the Centre

The Centre focuses on building excellence and discussing innovation in the career and workforce development field. The goal of the social learning community is to communicate goals, challenges, constructive feedback, and questions in relation to career and workforce development. The Centre should be a place for continued learning and development as well as a place to discuss the future of our field (solicitation without written consent by the Project or Advisory team, is strictly prohibited). Any post or comment that is determined to be soliciting any individual or group will be deleted, and the user account may be locked until an investigation regarding the post has been concluded. The user may be given a written warning or removed from the CPDC platform depending on the findings of the investigation.

Post your discussions or documents in the most appropriate group or topic

Especially within the social learning community, make reasonable efforts to ensure that posts and materials are allocated to the appropriate group or topic. This will prevent cluttering the feed and make it easier for everyone to find the information that they are seeking. Individuals who do this repeatedly will be contacted by one of the group admins and asked to follow these guidelines.

Privacy and Release of Information

CDPC-CEDC will not release your information to any third-party agencies.

Thank you and welcome to the CDPC