Identity Crisis for Guidance Counsellors in Quebec

Published

March 6, 2024

Category

Table of Contents

Is job dissatisfaction affecting guidance counsellors in schools? This article reveals the tensions in their professional practice.

It’s important to feel accomplished in one’s profession. CDPs are not exempt from the possibility of professional dissatisfaction.   

A Brief Overview of Guidance Counsellors’ Reforms in Quebec  

Towards the end of the 1990s, the Quebec government undertook to reform the education sector to align its policies with the management principles used in the private sector (such as management based on results and individual performance). The profession of guidance counsellors has aligned itself with this new reality in the school system. The desire for greater efficiency has led guidance counsellors to do less individual counselling with students and more concerted work with parents and teachers.   

In 2009, a reform of the counselling professions created a number of “reserved acts”1 for guidance counsellors in Quebec, including the right to work with students with disabilities and/or learning difficulties. Since then, the practice of guidance counselling has been put under pressure due to the government’s desire to ensure both greater efficiency in interventions AND personalized support for certain students. 

Viviers, Anne and Dionne’s Study  

This type of contradiction in the practice of a profession can lead to suffering. Indeed, it can be difficult to navigate between the expectations one has of a job and the constraints imposed by one’s professional environment. Viviers, Anne, and Dionne aimed to measure this gap between expectations and reality, using a questionnaire listing 84 professional activities. For each activity, the 224 respondents (guidance counsellors in schools) were asked to indicate the extent to which it was an activity imposed by their regulatory body and/or the school setting, and the extent to which the activity represented a desired and/or actual action. 

Five profiles, each representing a different degree of suffering, were identified by the study:  

  • Versatile professionals (18% of all guidance counsellors): These guidance counsellors, most of whom work in private schools, are fairly satisfied with their work, and feel that there is hardly any gap between their desired work and their actual work.  
  • Satisfied professionals without administrative work (13%): These guidance counsellors, who are relatively more likely to be found in public schools, are satisfied with their job, except for the administrative tasks imposed.  
  • Impeded professionals (20%): Often in more precarious employment situations, these counsellors experience a significant gap between the way they would like to do their job and the reality.    
  • Pragmatist professionals (31%): These counsellors are characterized by a reluctance to carry out less desirable activities, and a relative satisfaction with activities oriented towards tangible results.  
  • Suffering professionals (18%): Guidance counsellors in this group are very dissatisfied with the excessive number of administrative tasks imposed on them, resulting in submissiveness and withdrawal from their profession.   

Based on these results, the authors found that all profiles would like to see more direct intervention with students, especially with the most vulnerable ones. Guidance counsellors in Quebec would also like their work to take on a more consultative and collaborative role. Yet guidance counsellors are often forced to perform administrative tasks that cause them frustration.   

The identity-related suffering caused by professional practice can be damaging to the psychological health of professionals. To overcome this problem, the authors suggest the use of strategies to protect the profession, such as union mobilization, collective action, and promoting the relevance of professional guidance services. This could be an avenue for guidance counsellors who wish to change the constraints imposed by their professional environment and, as a result, be more fulfilled by their job. 

Research / Original Citation

Viviers, S., Anne, A. & Dionne, P. (2019). L’évolution de l’identité de métier des conseillers d’orientation à l’aune des transformations de l’organisation du travail scolaire au Québec. Éducation et sociétés, 43(1), 93–118. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/34598

The sample of 224 participants represents 28% of the population targeted by the survey, which was originally launched for all guidance counsellors working in schools in the province of Quebec (814 people). This proportion is adequate to draw interesting conclusions at the Quebec level (but not generalizable to Canada as a whole, where the profession is different). However, it is possible that the people who responded to the questionnaire were the most dissatisfied with their jobs, expressing a desire to change things through the action of completing the survey.

Fun Facts

The Act to amend the Professional Code in the field of mental health and human relations, commonly known as Bill 21, was passed in 2009 and came into force in 2012. This law redefined the scope of practice of several helping professions, reserving certain acts to members of a regulatory body or holding a specific permit. Bill 21 has been criticized, however, for adding a layer of complexity to the organization of helping professions and exacerbating the labour shortage.

Community Submission

Thank you Centre Admin for submitting this article summary.

Your Thoughts

Regardless of your field of activity (private practice, organization, school, etc.), do you notice a gap between the tasks you want to do in your job and those that are imposed on you? If so, do you have any strategies for limiting the frustration that imposed tasks can cause?

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More from the Library

Career Development Professional Centre

Code of Conduct

Help us cultivate a Centre we all enjoy by reviewing and following the Code of Conduct.

Our Purpose

Thank you for being a part of the Career Development Professional Centre. To ensure that all members have the best possible experience, we have a few ground rules that we ask everyone to adhere to. This code of conduct applies equally to every person in the community and is intended to foster an online space that is inclusive, safe, and welcoming to all.

Centre Rules

Be welcoming

We strive to be a place that welcomes and supports people of all backgrounds and identities. We aim to be a place that promotes excellence and innovation in career and workforce development. Please extend respect to all members; we all come from different backgrounds and levels of knowledge and there is no such thing as a stupid question.

Be respectful

We won’t all agree all the time, but when we disagree don’t let those disagreements turn into personal attacks. A place where people feel uncomfortable or threatened will not be a productive one. When having discussions in the online community, commenting on a library article, or participating in other Centre activities, strive for productive conversations around the content being presented, not the person behind the content. Any comments determined to be “hate speech” towards any individual or group will be deleted, and the user account may be locked until an investigation regarding the comment has been concluded. The user may be given a written warning or removed from the CPDC platform depending on the findings of the investigation.

Hate Speech could include and is not limited to:

  • Violent threats or language directed against another person
  • Discriminatory jokes, language, or materials
  • Defamatory or abusive language or materials
  • Profane or illegal materials
  • Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior

A good rule of thumb is to never say anything that you wouldn’t be comfortable with the world seeing or that you wouldn’t want anyone knowing came from you. We ask that you keep in mind the focus of this place, which is building excellence and innovation in career and workforce development for all individuals.

Be considerate of the purpose of the Centre

The Centre focuses on building excellence and discussing innovation in the career and workforce development field. The goal of the social learning community is to communicate goals, challenges, constructive feedback, and questions in relation to career and workforce development. The Centre should be a place for continued learning and development as well as a place to discuss the future of our field (solicitation without written consent by the Project or Advisory team, is strictly prohibited). Any post or comment that is determined to be soliciting any individual or group will be deleted, and the user account may be locked until an investigation regarding the post has been concluded. The user may be given a written warning or removed from the CPDC platform depending on the findings of the investigation.

Post your discussions or documents in the most appropriate group or topic

Especially within the social learning community, make reasonable efforts to ensure that posts and materials are allocated to the appropriate group or topic. This will prevent cluttering the feed and make it easier for everyone to find the information that they are seeking. Individuals who do this repeatedly will be contacted by one of the group admins and asked to follow these guidelines.

Privacy and Release of Information

CDPC-CEDC will not release your information to any third-party agencies.

Thank you and welcome to the CDPC